My new Flickr account..reincarnation Gurdjieff

http://www.flickr.com/photos/74318778@N08/ This is some of the photos I have put together in a Flickr account to show that we reincarnate and that life is eternal, I hope this work help people to understand the true reason behind their existence.

GURDJIEFF REINCARANTED SOUL GROUP

SOLITA SOLANO & RENE CAMPBELL

Note the similarity between the two pictures above. You could say it is the very same person. This is one of those situations where the incarnated soul has chosen the same looks as she had in her former life, if you walked pass those two people in the street at the same time and they wore the same style and cloths as each other you would say they were twins, but we have a number of years difference between the times these two bodies lived.

Below I have extracted some information about Solita Solano from a website on the internet note that her experiences of relationship are not very successful. During my time with Rene we had a dialogue through email and on facebook, she had difficulties in her relationships and this was mostly the theme of the email dialogue we had with each other there was also a self destructive a lack of self esteem feature with her, in that she had an issue with not feeling good enough about who and what she was, and this point is suggestive in her chosen profession as a body builder as she put it to me. : “ A body builder is always self criticising and that is what I am like about myself”

She also portrayed some one that was very strong willed hence she is a champion body builder today. Solita Solano wrote about fictional characters that she invented they portrayed a part of her own psyche she was strong willed and a lesbian so is Rene. The next part is copy and pasted from a website on the internet about Solita Solano:

Solano was not a prolific writer: she published only three novels and one book of poetry,Statue in a Field (1934"), all within the first twelve years of her life in Paris. Her fiction is best characterized as psychological realism, but it also displays a somewhat romantic affinity for the exotic, the Oriental, and the flamboyant in her choice of image, metaphor, and minutely detailed description. She seems obsessed with the failures of human relationships. Her three novels explore unrequited love and distraught marriage relationships and involve strong-willed characters (the men often neurotic and the women raffish) whose obsessions and self-indulgences result in self-destruction and whose stormy affairs end in bitterness and disillusionment.
The Uncertain Feast (1924), her first novel, is set in New York and is about Daniel Greer, a man whose hard work and determination in the face of extreme odds win him the editorship of a thriving newspaper, but whose weak, neurotic personality results in the failure of his much longed-for marriage to Amy Fiske, a socialite from Boston. She becomes indifferent and lazy; he selfish and even brutal. His efforts to get from life all that he can without regard for others result in bitter triumphs and successes without rewards. He seems, paradoxically, both a giant and a pygmy.
The Happy Failure (1925) repeats the themes of a sour marriage and the misfit personality. Its hero, Timothy Doan, struggles between the conflicting influences of his money-making father, his society-loving mother and sister, his wife's wish that he go into business, and his own dream to live a secluded life in the country where he would have time to write. An irreparable gulf widens between father and son and between husband and wife. The couple separates after one year of marriage. The hero, however, sees his failure as the beginning of a new freedom.
The third novel, This Way Up (1927), involves yet another bad marriage and a childish, self-centered character. Anthony, an American architect, returns to Paris ostensibly to study but actually to pursue Rosario, a pert Catalonian dancer who has led him on for two years. When in Paris she flaunts a new lover in his face, he, in a fit of anger and despair, marries a girl whom he met on the liner. The marriage ends in heartbreak; Rosario alone remains untouched by the havoc she has helped to create.
Solano's work, in the words of transition's editors (who published an excerpt from This Way Up in the September 1927 issue), "had the honor of not pleasing" most American critics, who criticized her "sophisticated" use of classical allusions, her stark amorous detail, and her "execrable" and "abhorrent" style. A few critics, however, lauded her fictional realism for its "impeccable psychology" and "absolute ruthlessness," comparing her to Theodore Dreiser and Ben Hecht. Reviewer Lillian Hellman appreciated This Way Up for its acute observations and intelligence and admired its young author for treating Paris not with "that palsy of admiration which strikes so many American writers" but "as if it were founded by human beings." Solano's prose is frequently over detailed, but it does convey with fidelity and vigor what she perceived as a fundamental ugliness and decay in the hearts and minds of modern human beings.
Solano's feelings about the Paris literary scene and her own career were ambivalent. In her response to the questionnaire that appeared in the final issue of the Little Review (May 1929), she said that she considered art "pleasant but unimportant" and that she disliked "the stupidity and vileness of human relations" as well as "stories (both dirty and clean), what passes for art, reality (except for laboratory data) ... the theatre, novels" and "banal conversation." After 1930 her literary output declined, and she led an increasingly quieter life. In the mid-thirties she, along with Margaret Anderson and her friend Georgette Leblanc, became a disciple of the Russo-Greek mystic George Gurdjieff who had established a spiritual retreat at Fontainebleau-Avon, and for five years she served as Gurdjieff's secretary. In her later years she worked at times as an editor and involved herself in her special interest, etymology. She died at the age of eighty-six in the Paris suburb of Orgeval.


























CRAIG HAMILTON PARKER



CRAIG HAMILTON ORAGE KNOWN TO HAVE SIGN
PARKER (FORMERLY PARKER) HIS NAME O'RAGE


























If you were to paint hair onto Craig s head and darken his eye brows then you would have two pictures here that look very similar to each other in many ways.

Note the similarity between the jaw bones, the bags under the eyes, the nose, the cheek bones even the ears are very similar. The eyes and the distance between the eyes and the eye brows, the lips, the cheeks again except for the hair the facial features are almost identical. Craig carries a little more weight than this picture shown Orage is carrying. The parallels between the two are even more astounding: Craig opened three art studios during his time he was involved in art work. Orage also opened up three art studios. Orage would often sign his name with a Celtic tone such as this: O'Rage where as Craig changed his name from Craig Parker to Craig Hamilton Parker also with a Celtic tone. Orage had a deep seated interest in psychology, Jung especially, so does Craig. Another strange parallel is that a book written about Orage and Gurdjieff which is titled Gurdjieff and Orage Brothers in Elysium. Some years ago Craig created a psychic medium website as a school for psychic mediums and one area of that website which is a free public chat area is called Elysium. It is there that I would meet him during the time I was involved in medium-ship with him.

Orage was the editor and publisher of a London magazine called the: “New Age” in a casual chat I had with Craig some years ago on one of our so called spiritual walks we often have together he told me that some time ago he had made plans to create a magazine and call it the “New Age”. Craig was born the 22nd January, Orage was born the 24th January, very close dates to each other. Orage pushed himself to extreme physically and emotionally, so does Craig. Orage was a journalist and an essayist so was Craig. Craig wrote a regular column in a psychic magazine. Craig and his wife Jane had a slot in the Morning TV show where as Orage had regular appearances on the radio which was then the media of the day.
Orage also was involved with the metaphysical including Clairvoyance which is how Craig makes his living at the moment. Orage and Gurdjieff were like brothers as stated by Gurdjieff when he heard of the death of Orage he is known to have said: ...”This man is my brother”. Today I feel that Craig is like my brother. We are close friends and go back many life times together. Craig had a successful advertising business and made a big career change when he decided to become a full time medium. Orage also was a very successful publisher and made a big career change when he started working with Gurdjieff.








































DEREK CAMERON




DEREK CAMERON OUSPENSKY



























Note the eyes the nose the lips Ouspensky was a mathematician a book writer he took groups of people to teach a spiritual system, Derek does exactly the same, he is also a mathematician, he writes books and takes groups of people to teach them how to meditate. Ouspensky went in search of a spiritual master in order to find some answers about life, he went around the world in his search, Derek again has done exactly the same thing, and he is sticking around me today just like he did with Gurdjieff in order to understand spiritual dimensions to his own life we work together quite a lot on the internet in spiritual groups and discussions.












TONY RICHARDS


TONY RICHARDS THOMAS DE HARTMAN

































Thomas De Hartman he was connected to the music industry and there is mention of Ju Jitsu in his life, Tony's wife is connected to the music industry and theatre Tony is also a 6th Dan Ju Jitsu instructor. Note the very close resemblance between the two pictures. When I met Tony many years ago I already identified him as being some one who was a great friend of mine in the past and that we had lifetimes connected to the Ju Jitsu together. Just like De Hartman Tony had a great interest in spirituality and we often have long spiritual discussions together about spiritual things, we are also close friends just like Gurdjieff and De Hartman were. There was one thing that gave me a great issue in this identification and that was that Tony was already 7 years old before De Hartman died yet my feeling was that this was who he was. Then one day as is often the case a book turned up during this period of investigation, the book was called “Journey of The souls” By Michael Newton. He just like me was researching past life and reincarnation. He put people into deep hypnotic states and took them to past lives and the area between lives, he also makes mention of the idea that I had already been coming to and that was that some thing happens with time when the soul leaves the body and that it is also possible that the soul can enter the body after the body has been born.

I think there needs to be more work carried out on this concerning the physics of it. Anyway it confirmed what I had come to about this possibility.



TAMARA PAPENBURG

JULIA OSTROWSKA TAMARA PAPENBURG TAMARA PAPENBURG



































Julia Ostrowska was Gurdjieff's wife and a ballerina from the Russian Ballet. Tamara was also a Ballerina. At a very young age her mother noted even when she was still only able to pull herself up on the cot bar that she made ballerina type movements. Her mother who is my wife in this present life, immediately noticed her unusual ballet type movements and from this decided to put her into ballet when she became old enough to enter her first class.

Again I identified Tamara as being some one I had known from a past life. Today Tamara is my step-daughter. Note the similarities of the eyes, jaw bone, the lips etc. There is a strong feeling that I often pick up from Tamara when I am in her company and a lot of psychic happenings around her between her mother and myself.
A gifted and well known psychic medium Jane Hamilton Parker once told us that Tamara in her former life she was connected to the Tsars, the royalty of Russia without ever meeting Tamara face to face. Both women liked horses and were involved with ballet in a passionate manor. At the moment of Jane's reading I did not know anything about Julia in such detail. Now I have found out that this is also said to fit the description of Julia Ostrowska. Except for the connection with the Russian Tsars Tamara and Julia are showing both all the same interests. It has been said that Julia could not have any children and her marriage to Gurdjieff was never blessed with children. In this life Tamara gave birth to a little boy but the delivery was very dramatic and needed surgical intervention to safe both their lives.


JOHN CORNICK



JOHN CORNICK DMITRI GURDJIEFF











This is my brother John and next to him is my brother from my last life Dmitri. In this situation we have what I call the 180% turn around syndrome. Meaning that when we think and feel that some thing in our life we did, or were, or had, liked or hated it, we will turn it around by 180 degrees. Dmitri as you can see is smoothed faced and John has a face full of character. Now I feel that Dmitri had issues with the way he looked and that this did not favour him in situations he would have liked favour so this time he decided to come back with a look that was 180% different than how he was in his last life time. Dmitri had problems containing his anger and he was an initiator of business ideas, very independent. Towards the end of his life he became interested in Christianity. John is exactly the same today as Dmitri was only this time he has chosen a more rugged looking appearance.

















STEINAR LUND



STEINAR LUND JEAN TOOMER STEINAR LUND JEAN TOOMER


















In the case of Steinar Lund and Jean Toomer again this is one of those 180% turn around.
Jean Toomer had African origin and it has been written that he felt that his ethical back ground had a negative effect on his life as Jean Toomer. Racism was still very present in society in his lifetime especially in America. Jean Toomer has in this life chosen to be born in Norway. You cannot get more Caucasian than that. Like Jean Toomer, Steinar has interests in psychology NLP and Oriental spiritual traditions. Note in the pictures above the physical characteristics how very similar they are and also though they are born into different racial back grounds they still have similar features. Again this also has that uncomfortable thing with time that is Steinar was already born and some years old before Toomer had died this is answered in the book I mentioned before “The journey of the souls” by Michael Newton. A happening waiting to be put to physics. Another similarity is children. Although Jean Toomer was married and his wife fell pregnant she died during child birth. Steinar is totally not interested in getting married or having children in this life time although he is a long term relationship.

I have only mentioned a few people around me within this life time which I know I have been with before. I have identified De Salzeman from the Gurdjieff life in a close friend but because of the lack of contact with this friend I have left it out from the above list because I do not have any photo's of him to put him next to photo's of De Salzeman but the similarities are very strong.

What is wisdom?

Great answer Bill and Russell, but still I 'FEEL' there is some thing missing call it intuition, does that word have any ground in philosophy? Any way to the topic:

A simple question for me to ask, what is wisdom? And; "mans wisdom" is wisdom to have inner wisdom ie He finds answers to his own life thereby giving him inner peace contentment joy and happiness he has found inner equilibrium that keeps him free from all those negativities of mind, and he has also found the answer to the external influences that may of had control over his own mind, and by finding the ingredients to having "OWN" inner peace, (Equilibrium) he therefore has the ingredients for other people also to have their inner peace. Therefore he can advise for the so called unwise who have not got those ingredients of wisdom.

And for those people who are wise, where would we say they had been given this wisdom from? Can we say from genetics, environment or from a bit of both? Or is there some way they "Process" their own minds so that they can see things more clearly ie a mind discipline that the unwise do not have.

For instance can you focus your attention on one issue sufficiently to come to a wise answer if your mind has many many other thoughts running through it to much data or over flow of thought, possibly creating the unwise.

And if a man has the ability to stem all thoughts except the issue itself will that ability to focus mean he will come up with better answers, that is he comes up with the wisest answers ?

A metaphor could fit this bill: If we fill a barrel with water and the barrel has many leaks in it none of the leaks have any force, yet if we can block the leaks and only keep one leak open then this has all the energy or all the focus and a better answer is given.

In this analogy we could say wisdom is about the ability to have self mental discipline and total focus, which can be trained, therefore that would not make it totally genetic though genetics and environment cannot be ruled out.


Does any body agree with this analogy of Wisdom?

If not can you point out where you think this analogy fails specifically?

A state of conciousness beyond mind

There is a state of consciousness that goes beyond mind, it is here that god or what is labelled god can be identified by individuals separately within each self, as scientists we may call this zero point energy as everything stops even breath, but this can only be repeated within each person who pursues these deep levels of research of their own human psyche, I can vouch for this level as I have made my own research in deep levels of meditation.

What is rational?

To have a 'Belief' is not a rational thing, one should "KNOW" God, or god, or be rational enough to say: One does NOT know.

THE ETERNAL SONG OF LOVE

• Kaila Kukla prince you are amusing but also speak truth

  3 hours ago · · 1 personLoading... ·
• 

  Kaila Kukla but why your mask?

  3 hours ago · · 1 personLoading... ·
• 

  Catriona Macleod love is blind, can't see past itself for looking... haha.. Om sai

  2 hours ago · · 1 personLoading... ·
• 

  Catriona Macleod God bless honesty, integrity and truth in all Consciousness by Divine Revelation Om Amen

  2 hours ago · · 1 personLoading... ·
• 

  Prince DarkGuru Why the masks? for sex for money for life. Still you do not see your own mask after this?

  5 minutes ago ·
• 

  Prince DarkGuru Let me tell you just as a true new born cannot speak, so it is when all the masks are stripped away so to this new born cannot speak.

  2 minutes ago ·
• 

  Prince DarkGuru He cannot speak with his mouth yet his heart sings the eternal song of LOVE.

ABOUT THE CHURCH AND PETER

• 

  Phillipou Albert Cornick

  Margie.....to further rebut the Protestant argument that Jesus was speaking about Peter’s confession of faith (not Peter himself) based on the revelation he received, the verses are clear that Jesus, after acknowledging Peter’s receipt of d...ivine revelation, turns the whole discourse to the person of Peter: Blessed are “you” Simon, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to “you,” and I tell “you,” “you” are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church. I will give “you” the keys to the kingdom, and whatever “you” bind and loose on earth will be bound and loosed in heaven. Jesus’ whole discourse relates to the person of Peter, not his confession of faith.
  
  This is what I read from the bible also and what I try to understand was how can you build a church on Peter? There was some thing about Peter that made Jesus say this, ie he recognised that he was Messiah, in order to recognise him he, only in my opinion must have had great faith, and that makes sense to me otherwsie none of it does, also when you think that Jesus said he was going to build a church in 3 days. Remember also that Peter was the one who had so much faith that he walked accross the water to meet Jesus, though he failed at the last moment as everyone knows, and when they were about to crucify him he also run away, in fact when you think about that time Judas Iscariot was the only one who laid down his life because of Jesus.
  
  Can you tell me where it is shown that the church was meant to be a solid structure? Another thing Jesus said where two or three gather in my name there shall I be that is what I understood to be his church, there was still no reference to a solid structure what do you think Margie?See More

  7 minutes ago ·
• 

  Phillipou Albert Cornick If a groups of us come together in Christs name and have the faith of Peter, then that would bring Christ to us, that is my simple reasoning going on what I have said, a solid structure built on Peter just does not make sense to you get what I mean?

  6 minutes ago ·
• 

  Phillipou Albert Cornick In spiritualist churches groups of people come together to call up spirits of deceased people as they did in the time of Saul, not only do they call up spirits but it has also been common knowledge that they call up angels and God, and of course when you consider the occult they also call up demons, now this is done by groups of people coming together in the way Jesus suggests, there seems to be certainly a relationship here and the tool they use in this calling up is actually Belief, or if you like FAITH.